league junction
Football Basketball Cricket IPL Cricket FIFA NBA Premier League Champions League
AboutContactPrivacy Policy

Rim protection numbers punish bigs for their coach's choices

A centre defending in a deep drop and one asked to blitz produce very different rim statistics from identical ability.

Rim protection numbers punish bigs for their coach's choices

Two centres, same league, same age, similar length. One holds opponents to a poor conversion rate at the rim and the other looks ordinary, and every list you read will treat that gap as a difference in ability. Often it is a difference in instruction.

Consider what a deep drop actually asks. The big sits below the level of the screen, concedes the pull-up jumper, and takes on the driver near the restricted area with his feet and his hands up. He accumulates a large number of contested shots at the rim because his scheme funnels traffic to him. He also picks up fouls, because contact near the basket is contact near the basket, and foul rate is the tax on being present.

Now consider a big asked to hedge hard at the arc twice per possession. His rim numbers barely exist. He is not there. When he does recover, he arrives from behind and blocks or fouls at the worst possible angle, which is how a good defender ends up with a bad-looking chart.

I would rather see rim protection expressed as a share of the opportunities the scheme gave the player, but nobody publishes that, so we get raw allowed percentages that quietly rank coaching philosophies and call it player evaluation. The teams doing this work internally know it. It shows up in the market. It is one of the reasons a centre can be signed cheaply from a switching team and look transformed in a drop scheme, which the outside world then calls a great piece of scouting rather than what it usually was, a correction of a mislabeled number.

There is a related trap in the other direction. A big who never fouls at the rim is sometimes a big who has learned not to contest, and the cheapest way to keep your foul rate down is to stand there with your arms up and let the shot go in.

The market inefficiency runs the other way too. A big who has spent three years hedging and recovering has been trained out of the patience a drop demands, and dropping him into a conservative scheme does not automatically produce good numbers. He has to unlearn the urge to meet the ball. That takes most of a season, which is longer than the patience of the team that signed him.

Absence is not discipline. It just photographs better.